The content of the article:
Boris Johnson is bidding to head off a Tory rebellion over emergency coronavirus legislation as he prepares to give his latest update on the COVID-19 crisis from Downing Street.
The prime minister – who was forced to apologise for getting confused by his own coronavirus regulations – is facing the prospect of a Conservative revolt when MPs are asked to renew the emergency powers that were given to ministers to deal with the pandemic back in March.
Sir Graham Brady, the chair of the influential 1922 Committee of Tory backbenchers, is leading an effort to alter legislation so as to allow the House of Commons to debate and vote on new COVID-19 measures before they come into force.
There are said to be 80 Tory MPs backing Sir Graham’s proposed amendment to the Coronavirus Act, with one ringleader having told Sky News he is “certain” the group has enough votes to defeat the government.
Former Brexit minister Steve Baker, who has recently been spotted in Westminster wearing a T-shirt declaring “2020 is the new 1984”, said an “absolutely huge rebellion” was brewing.
However, the government is still attempting to reach a compromise with the rebels, with talks due to be held between the group’s leaders and Conservative chief whip Mark Spencer on Wednesday morning.
Ministers will be careful not to concede too much that might impinge on their ability to act urgently when necessary, with coronavirus cases continuing to rise in the UK.
It was announced on Tuesday that 7,143 cases of coronavirus had been recorded in the UK over the past 24 hours – the biggest rise since the pandemic began.
Yet, even if a compromise isn’t reached between the chief whip and rebels, ministers might also be saved by Commons Speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle not accepting Sir Graham’s proposed amendment.
Constitutional experts have said the circumstances of Wednesday’s vote – which does not create new legislation but instead gives a choice over whether to continue existing law – means Sir Lindsay might be unlikely to allow any amendments.
In addition to the rebels’ efforts, Mr Johnson has also been warned by a committee of senior MPs that, without a greater say for parliament over coronavirus restrictions, the government’s rules could be challenged in court.
Sir Bernard Jenkin, the chair of the Commons liaison committee, wrote in a letter to the prime minister: “Various proposals are being made that would require the approval by a vote of the House of Commons before or immediately after new restrictions come into force.
“The majority of us support this principle and expect that the government will also wish to accept it.
“The idea that such restrictions can be applied without express parliamentary approval, except in dire emergency, is not widely acceptable and indeed may be challenged in law.”
:: Subscribe to the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker
As well the pressure to cede to the latest calls from MPs for a greater say over COVID-19 restrictions, Mr Johnson faces a busy schedule on Wednesday as he deals with a second wave of coronavirus infections in the UK.
After an expected meeting with his cabinet, the prime minister will head to the House of Commons for Prime Minister’s Questions.
Mr Johnson will face Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer a day after he apologised for having “misspoke” about the latest coronavirus restrictions in northeast England.
The prime minister was forced to clarify that the new rules mean local residents cannot meet people from different households in social settings indoors, including in pubs and restaurants.
After Prime Minister’s Questions, Mr Johnson is due to appear at a Downing Street news conference alongside England’s chief medical officer, Professor Chris Whitty, and the government’s chief scientific adviser, Sir Patrick Vallance, to give the latest update on the COVID-19 crisis.
What you can and can't do – and the penalties for breaking the rules
Last week, Sir Patrick said the UK could soon see 49,000 new cases of coronavirus every day unless action is taken to drive down the rate of infection – a warning that preceded Mr Johnson’s decision to introduce a 10pm curfew for bars, pubs and restaurants.
Downing Street has not ruled out the introduction of further restrictions in an attempt to limit the spread of COVID-19.